Does Bitcoin meet the definition of a Ponzi scheme? That is the topic of the most recent Cointelegraph Crypto Duel, the place Bitcoin strategist at Kraken meets professor of laptop science on the College of Campinas, Jorge Stolfi.
Much like different Bitcoin skeptics, Stolfi repeatedly outlined Bitcoin as a Ponzi scheme. The core of his argument is that Bitcoin doesn’t produce any money flows and the cash with which Bitcoin traders are paid comes solely from new traders shopping for Bitcoin.
“Each time you spend money on Bitcoin, the cash that you just make investments goes to the earlier traders or to the miners and disappears”, Stolfi mentioned.
Responding to Stolfi’s argument, Rochard identified that Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer money system and, like different types of cash, it’s not supposed to supply a money move.
“It is only a common property of cash as a result of it’s money. So it does not have money flows and that does not make it a Ponzi scheme.”, Rochard mentioned.
Rochard additionally identified that Bitcoin is totally different from Ponzi schemes in that it doesn’t assure fastened returns, and is well-known to be a extremely dangerous asset.
“Bitcoin’s promoters repeatedly emphasize that there’s a danger of loss and that if we take a look at the empirical information, this danger has repeatedly been realized”, mentioned Rochard. “That is not how Ponzi schemes work”, he added.
Stolfi, nevertheless, is satisfied that efficient Ponzi schemes don’t promise return since that might be “a useless giveaway.” “The S.E.C. would come knocking at your door the subsequent day”, he argued.
For example, the pc scientist talked about the infamous Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, which defrauded 1000’s of traders for $65 billion. “He did not promise something. […] The explanation why folks invested in it’s that he was paying everyone who wished to money out”.
Choose your facet and watch the complete debate on Cointelegraph’s Youtube channel!